Serveur d'exploration sur le renard

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys

Identifieur interne : 000405 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000404; suivant : 000406

Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys

Auteurs : Mackenzie R. Jeffress [États-Unis] ; Craig P. Paukert [États-Unis] ; Brett K. Sandercock [États-Unis] ; Philip S. Gipson [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:BC3D2B9F0E70B07903FA43E106167895FB5A1D30

English descriptors

Abstract

Sign surveys are commonly used to study and monitor wildlife species but may be flawed when surveys are conducted only once and cover short distances, which can lead to a lack of accountability for false absences. Multiple observers surveyed for river otter (Lontra canadensis) scat and tracks along stream and reservoir shorelines at 110 randomly selected sites in eastern Kansas from January to April 2008 and 2009 to determine if detection probability differed among substrates, sign types, observers, survey lengths, and near access points. We estimated detection probabilities (p) of river otters using occupancy models in Program PRESENCE. Mean detection probability for a 400‐m survey was highest in mud substrates (p = 0.60) and lowest in snow (p = 0.18) and leaf litter substrates (p = 0.27). Scat had a higher detection probability (p = 0.53) than tracks (p = 0.18), and experienced observers had higher detection probabilities (p > 0.71) than novice observers (p < 0.55). Detection probabilities increased almost 3‐fold as survey length increased from 200 m to 1,000 m, and otter sign was not concentrated near access points. After accounting for imperfect detection, our estimates of otter site occupancy based on a 400‐m survey increased >3‐fold, providing further evidence of the potential negative bias that can occur in estimates from sign surveys when imperfect detection is not addressed. Our study identifies areas for improvement in sign survey methodologies and results are applicable for sign surveys commonly used for many species across a range of habitats. © 2010 The Wildlife Society

Url:
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.12


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" sort="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" uniqKey="Jeffress M" first="Mackenzie R." last="Jeffress">Mackenzie R. Jeffress</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paukert, Craig P" sort="Paukert, Craig P" uniqKey="Paukert C" first="Craig P." last="Paukert">Craig P. Paukert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sandercock, Brett K" sort="Sandercock, Brett K" uniqKey="Sandercock B" first="Brett K." last="Sandercock">Brett K. Sandercock</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gipson, Philip S" sort="Gipson, Philip S" uniqKey="Gipson P" first="Philip S." last="Gipson">Philip S. Gipson</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BC3D2B9F0E70B07903FA43E106167895FB5A1D30</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/jwmg.12</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BC3D2B9F0E70B07903FA43E106167895FB5A1D30/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001144</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001144</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001143</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000179</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000179</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-541X:2011:Jeffress M:factors:affecting:detectability</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000408</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000405</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000405</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" sort="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" uniqKey="Jeffress M" first="Mackenzie R." last="Jeffress">Mackenzie R. Jeffress</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Kansas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Current Address: Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Idaho</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Kansas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paukert, Craig P" sort="Paukert, Craig P" uniqKey="Paukert C" first="Craig P." last="Paukert">Craig P. Paukert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>United States Geological Survey, Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Kansas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Current Address: United States Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Missouri (État)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sandercock, Brett K" sort="Sandercock, Brett K" uniqKey="Sandercock B" first="Brett K." last="Sandercock">Brett K. Sandercock</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Kansas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gipson, Philip S" sort="Gipson, Philip S" uniqKey="Gipson P" first="Philip S." last="Gipson">Philip S. Gipson</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Texas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of Wildlife Management</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">The Journal of Wildlife Management</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-541X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1937-2817</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Hoboken, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-01">2011-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">75</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="144">144</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="150">150</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-541X</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">BC3D2B9F0E70B07903FA43E106167895FB5A1D30</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1002/jwmg.12</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">JWMG12</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-541X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Kansas</term>
<term>Lontra canadensis</term>
<term>detection probability</term>
<term>river otter</term>
<term>scat</term>
<term>sign surveys</term>
<term>tracks</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Sign surveys are commonly used to study and monitor wildlife species but may be flawed when surveys are conducted only once and cover short distances, which can lead to a lack of accountability for false absences. Multiple observers surveyed for river otter (Lontra canadensis) scat and tracks along stream and reservoir shorelines at 110 randomly selected sites in eastern Kansas from January to April 2008 and 2009 to determine if detection probability differed among substrates, sign types, observers, survey lengths, and near access points. We estimated detection probabilities (p) of river otters using occupancy models in Program PRESENCE. Mean detection probability for a 400‐m survey was highest in mud substrates (p = 0.60) and lowest in snow (p = 0.18) and leaf litter substrates (p = 0.27). Scat had a higher detection probability (p = 0.53) than tracks (p = 0.18), and experienced observers had higher detection probabilities (p > 0.71) than novice observers (p < 0.55). Detection probabilities increased almost 3‐fold as survey length increased from 200 m to 1,000 m, and otter sign was not concentrated near access points. After accounting for imperfect detection, our estimates of otter site occupancy based on a 400‐m survey increased >3‐fold, providing further evidence of the potential negative bias that can occur in estimates from sign surveys when imperfect detection is not addressed. Our study identifies areas for improvement in sign survey methodologies and results are applicable for sign surveys commonly used for many species across a range of habitats. © 2010 The Wildlife Society</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Idaho</li>
<li>Kansas</li>
<li>Missouri (État)</li>
<li>Texas</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Kansas">
<name sortKey="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" sort="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" uniqKey="Jeffress M" first="Mackenzie R." last="Jeffress">Mackenzie R. Jeffress</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Gipson, Philip S" sort="Gipson, Philip S" uniqKey="Gipson P" first="Philip S." last="Gipson">Philip S. Gipson</name>
<name sortKey="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" sort="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" uniqKey="Jeffress M" first="Mackenzie R." last="Jeffress">Mackenzie R. Jeffress</name>
<name sortKey="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" sort="Jeffress, Mackenzie R" uniqKey="Jeffress M" first="Mackenzie R." last="Jeffress">Mackenzie R. Jeffress</name>
<name sortKey="Paukert, Craig P" sort="Paukert, Craig P" uniqKey="Paukert C" first="Craig P." last="Paukert">Craig P. Paukert</name>
<name sortKey="Paukert, Craig P" sort="Paukert, Craig P" uniqKey="Paukert C" first="Craig P." last="Paukert">Craig P. Paukert</name>
<name sortKey="Sandercock, Brett K" sort="Sandercock, Brett K" uniqKey="Sandercock B" first="Brett K." last="Sandercock">Brett K. Sandercock</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/RenardV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000405 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000405 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    RenardV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:BC3D2B9F0E70B07903FA43E106167895FB5A1D30
   |texte=   Factors affecting detectability of river otters during sign surveys
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Tue Mar 28 00:55:51 2017. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 16:57:14 2024